• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊

不同围护结构变形模式对坑外深层土体位移场影响的对比分析

郑刚, 邓旭, 刘畅, 刘庆晨

郑刚, 邓旭, 刘畅, 刘庆晨. 不同围护结构变形模式对坑外深层土体位移场影响的对比分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(2): 273-285. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201402002
引用本文: 郑刚, 邓旭, 刘畅, 刘庆晨. 不同围护结构变形模式对坑外深层土体位移场影响的对比分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(2): 273-285. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201402002
ZHENG Gang, DENG Xu, LIU Chang, LIU Qing-chen. Comparative analysis of influences of different deformation modes of retaining structures on displacement field of deep soils outside excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(2): 273-285. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201402002
Citation: ZHENG Gang, DENG Xu, LIU Chang, LIU Qing-chen. Comparative analysis of influences of different deformation modes of retaining structures on displacement field of deep soils outside excavations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(2): 273-285. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201402002

不同围护结构变形模式对坑外深层土体位移场影响的对比分析  English Version

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助项目(2010CB732106); 天津市科技计划项目(11ZCGYSF00800)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郑 刚(1967- ),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事土力学及岩土工程教学与科研工作。E-mail: zhenggang1967@163.com。

  • 中图分类号: TU470

Comparative analysis of influences of different deformation modes of retaining structures on displacement field of deep soils outside excavations

  • 摘要: 对某深基坑开挖全过程中围护桩的水平位移进行了实测,由于水平支撑提供的支撑刚度不同,不同位置处的围护桩可产生不同的水平位移分布模式,且最大水平位移值也存在明显差别。通过建立考虑土体小应变的有限元模型,针对4种典型围护结构变形模式引起的坑外深层土体位移场变化特点进行分析,结果表明:即使围护结构最大水平位移相同,由于侧移分布模式不同,基坑外地表和深层土体的竖向及水平位移场均可存在较大差别,从而可能对环境产生不同程度的影响。围护结构在内凸型和复合型模式下,坑外深层土体竖向变形可分为凹槽形沉降区、三角形过渡区和隆起区,而深层土体水平位移场可分为弓形变形区、变形过渡区以及悬臂形变形区;悬臂型模式下坑外深层土体竖向位移场只存在三角形变形区和隆起区,而水平位移场则全部呈悬臂形;踢脚型模式下的竖向位移和水平位移影响范围均为最大。在实际工程中除控制围护结构最大变形值外,尚应根据周围环境特点合理控制围护结构变形模式,并尽可能避免出现踢脚模式变形。
    Abstract: The horizontal displacements of the retaining piles are monitored through the whole process of a deep excavation project. It is found that, due to the differences of horizontal bracing stiffness, the deformation modes of the retaining piles at different locations are different, and the maximum horizontal displacements also have significant differences. Through FEM modeling, the characteristics of the displacement fields caused by four deformation modes of retaining walls are analyzed. The results show that under the situations of different deformation modes of retaining structures with the same maximum horizontal displacement, the displacement fields of soils outside the excavation can be considerably different, and therefore the impacts on environment may vary greatly. In practical projects, besides controlling the maximum horizontal displacements of the retaining structures, the deformation mode of the retaining structures should be optimized according to the surrounding environment, and their kick-in deformation should be avoided.
  • [1] PECK R B. Deep excavation and tunneling in soft gtound[C]// Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, State-of-the-Art- volume. Mexico City, 1969: 225-290.
    [2] CLOUGH G W, O’ROURKE T D. Construction induced movements of insitu walls[C]// Proceedings ASCE Conference on Soil and Mechanics and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures. New York: ASCE, Special Conference, 1990: 439-470.
    [3] HSIEH P G, OU C Y. Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35: 1004-1017.
    [4] 王卫东, 徐中华, 王建华. 上海地区深基坑周边地表变形性状实测统计分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11): 1659-1666. (WANG Wei-dong, XU Zhong-hua, WANG Jian-hua. Statistical analysis of characteristics of ground surface settlement caused by deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(11):1659-1666. (in Chinese))
    [5] DBJ08—61—97 上海市标准基坑工程设计规程[S]. 1997. (DBJ08—61—97 Shanghai standard code for design of excavation engineering[S]. 1997. (in Chinese))
    [6] 丁勇春. 软土地区深基坑施工引起的变形及控制研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2009. (DING Yong-chun. Excavation- induced deformation and control in soft deposits[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [7] 刘国彬, 王卫东. 基坑工程手册[M]. 2 版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. (LIU Guo-bin, WANG Wei-dong. Excavation engineering manual[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [8] CASPE M S. Surface settlement adjacent to braced open cuts[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1966, 92(SM4): 51-59.
    [9] 李佳川, 夏明耀. 地下连续墙深基坑开挖与纵向地下管线保护[J]. 同济大学学报, 1995, 23(5): 499-504. (LI Jia-chuan, XIA Ming-yao. Proteetion of longitudinal underground pipe lines during the diaphragm wall deep exeavation[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1995, 23(5): 499-504. (in Chinese))
    [10] AYE Z Z, KARKI D, SCHULZ C. Ground movement prediction and building damage risk-assessment for the deep excavations and tunneling works in Bangkok subsoil[C]// International Symposium on Underground Excavation and Tunnelling. Bangkok, 2006: 281-297.
    [11] OU C Y, LIAO J T, CHENG W L. Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation[J]. Géotechnique, 2000, 50(3): 209-220.
    [12] SCHUSTER M, KUNG G T C, JUANG C H, et al. Simplified model for evaluating damage potential of buildings adjacent to a braced excavation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(12): 1823-1835.
    [13] 龚晓南, 高有潮. 深基坑工程施工设计手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1998. (GONG Xiao-nan, GAO You-chao. Construction and design manual of deep excavation engineering[M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1998. (in Chinese))
    [14] JGJ 120—2012 建筑基坑支护技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. (JGJ 120—2012 Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [15] GB50497—2009 建筑基坑工程监测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2009. ( GB50497—2009 Technical code for monitoring of building foundation pit engineering[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [16] DB29—202—2010 建筑基坑工程技术规程[S]. 2010. (DB29—202—2010 Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavation[S]. 2010. (in Chinese))
    [17] 郑 刚, 李志伟. 不同围护结构变形形式的基坑开挖对邻近建筑物的影响对比分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(6): 970-977. (ZHENG Gang, LI Zhi-wei. Comparative analysis of responses of buildings adjacent to excavations with different deformation modes of retaining walls[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(6): 970-977. (in Chinese))
    [18] 徐中华, 王卫东. 敏感环境下基坑数值分析中土体本构模型的选择[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(1): 258-326. (XU Zhong-hua, WANG Wei-dong. Selection of soil constitutive models for numerical analysis of deep excavations in close proximity to sensitive properties[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(1): 258-326. (in Chinese))
    [19] VUCETIC M, DOBRY R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response[J]. Journal of Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1991, 171(1): 89-107.
    [20] OU C Y, LIAO J T, LIN H D. Performance of diaphragm wall construction using top-down method[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(9): 798-808.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  514
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  656
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-06-13
  • 发布日期:  2014-02-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回